| Evelyn Moya | 2/12/2018 | Fire Inspectos | | PO Box 1252 | Isabela | 7873673021 | PR | 00662 | | | emoyagines@gmail.com | F | Evelyn Moya | Fire Inspector | F | 403.12.3 |
(Revise text as Follow)
403.12.3
Crowd managers for gatherings exceeding 1,000 people.
Where facilities or events involve a
gathering of more than 1,000
500
people, crowd
managers shall be provided in accordance
with Sections 403.12.3.1 through 403.12.3.3.
403.12.3.1 Number of crowd managers.
The minimum number of
Not fewer than two trained
crowd managers
,
shall be
established at a ratio of one
and not fewer than one trained
crowd
manager for
every
each
250 persons
or portion
thereof, shall be provided for the gathering
.
Exceptions: Where approved by the fire code official,
the number of crowd
managers shall be permitted to be reduced
where the facility is equipped
throughout with an approved automatic
sprinkler system or based upon the
nature of the event
1. Outdoor events with fewer than 1,000 persons in attendance
shall not
require crowd managers.
2. Assembly occupancies used exclusively for
religious worship with an
occupant load not exceeding 1,000 shall not
require crowd managers.
3. The number of crowd managers shall be
reduced where, in the opinion
of the fire code official, the
fire protection provided by the facility and
the nature
of the event warrant a reduction.
|
To have a more manageble number of people per crowd manager to garantee the life safety.
|
The cost impact is minimun
| No | No | Yes | Evelyn Moya Gines | Evelyn Moya Ginés | Puerto Rico | Myself | 787-367-3021 | emoyagines@gmail.com | 02/11/2018 | | |
| SPIRO SOUKIS | 3/2/2018 | CROWN CASTLE USA, INC. | Jimmy LaFontaine | 9615 Los Romero Ave. Suite 812 | San Juan | 7135703848 | PR | 00926 | | (787)641-2346 | spiro.soukis@crowncastle.com | IBC-S | SPIRO SOUKIS | CROWN CASTLE USA, INC. | S | | | | | No | No | No | | | | | | | | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| SPIRO SOUKIS | 3/5/2018 | CROWN CASTLE USA, INC. | JIMMY LaFONTAINE | 9615 Los Romero Ave. Suite 812 | San Juan | (787) 641-2352 | PR | 00926 | | (787)641-2346 | Jimmy.Lafontaine@crowncastle.com | IBC-S | SPIRO SOUKIS | CROWN CASTLE USA, INC. | S | CHAPTER 31 Special Construction / SECTION 3108 Telecommunications and Broadcast Towers - 3108.1 |
Delete Text as follows:
[BS] 3108.1 General.
Towers shall be designed and constructed in
accordance with the provisions of TIA-222.
Towers shall be designed for seismic loads; exceptions related to
seismic design listed in Section 2.7.3 of TIA-222 shall not apply. In Section
2.6.6.2 of TIA 222, the horizontal extent of Topographic Category 2,
escarpments, shall be 16 times the height of the escarpment.
Exception: Single
free-standing poles used to support antennas not greater than 75 feet (22 860
mm), measured from the top of the pole
to grade, shall not be required to be noncombustible.
[BS] 3108.2 Location and access.
Towers shall be located such that guy wires
and other accessories shall not cross or encroach on any street or other public
space, or over above-ground electric utility lines, or encroach on any
privately owned property without the written consent of the owner of the
encroached-upon property, space or above-ground electric utility lines. Towers
shall be equipped with climbing and working facilities in compliance with TIA-222.
Access to the tower sites shall be limited as required by applicable OSHA, FCC
and EPA regulations.
|
The language
to be deleted is now oboslete. The
latest revision of the TIA-222-H specifically addressed the exceptions in
Sections 2.7.3 and 2.6.6.2 to remove any conflict with the 2018 IBC and ASCE
7-10 and 16. The Sections from Revision
H are below for confirmation:
Section 2 ANSI/TIA-222-H
Section 2.6.6.2
Topographic Factor Procedures
1. Category 1: No abrupt changes in general topography, e.g.
flat or rolling terrain, no wind
speed-up
consideration shall be required (Kzt = 1.0).
2. Category 2: Structures located at or near the crest of an
escarpment. Wind speed-up
shall be considered
to occur in all directions. Structures located horizontally beyond 16 times the
height of the escarpment from its crest, shall be permitted to be considered as
Topographic Category 1.
Section 2.7.3 General
Structures addressed in the scope of this
Standard require special considerations of their
response characteristics in regions of
seismicity. The provisions of this Standard provide design
criteria to ensure sufficient strength,
ductility, stability and post-elastic energy dissipation to
resist the effects of seismic ground
motions. Special detailing requirements for steel structures
are not required due to the magnitude of
the response modification coefficients specified in this
Standard. All foundation and anchorage
requirements to provide the level of ductility and postelastic
energy dissipation of the structure
assumed for earthquake design are specified in 2.7.9
and Section 9.0.
Risk Category IV structures shall not be
located where a known potential exists for an active
fault to cause rupture of the ground
surface.
Drift limitations do not apply to
structures addressed in the scope of this Standard.
Foundations shall be considered as
non-elastic for the purposes of determining seismic load
effects. Reduction of foundation
reactions due to seismic load effects shall not be permitted.
Seismic load effects shall be evaluated
in accordance with the seismic analysis procedures
specified in 2.7.6 and 2.7.7.
An importance factor, I, shall be determined from Table 2-3 based on the
structure risk category listed in Table 2-1.
Determine the spectral response acceleration parameters (expressed as
a ratio to the acceleration due to gravity) at short periods, Ss, and at a period of 1
second, S1,
and the long-period transition period, TL, from 2.7.4.
Determine the site class based on the soil properties at the site in
accordance with Table 2-10.
Determine the short-period and long-period site coefficients, Fa and Fv, based on the site class
from Tables 2-11 and 2-12 respectively.
The design spectral response acceleration parameters at short periods,
SDS,
and at a period of 1 second, SD1, shall be determined in accordance with 2.7.5, shall be determined in accordance with 2.7.5, shall be determined in accordance with 2.7.5, shall be determined in accordance with 2.7.5.
The design spectral response acceleration parameters at short periods, Sds, and at a period of 1 second, Sd1, shall be determined in accordance with 2.7.5.
|
Will not increase/decrease the cost of construction. The proposal is editorial.
| No | No | No | Spiro Soukis | SPIRO SOUKIS | CROWN CASTLE USA, INC. | | (713) 570-3848 | spiro.soukis@crowncastle.com | 3/5/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| Mayra Perez | 3/26/2018 | energia elecrica | | Villa Pompeya P #3 Mediania Baja | loiza | 7875643410 | Puerto Rico | 00772 | | | nayelisriveraa@gmail.com | PRBC-PR | | por Mayra Perez | PR | | | | | No | No | Yes | Mayra Perez | | energia electrica | | 7875643410 | nayelisriveraa@gmail.com | marzo 26,2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | IIC-CIAPR | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | 787-758-2250 | PR | 00936-3845 | 202 | | presidente@ciapr.org | IBC-S | CRUZADO, FIGUEROA, HERRERA | CIAPR | S | 1603.1.4 |
5. Design wind pressures to be used for exterior
component and cladding materials not specifically designed by the
registered design professional responsible for the design of the structure, psf
(kN/m2)
|
Where another registered design professional is the delegated designer for the exterior components and cladding materials, the design wind pressures need to be calculated only by that professional.
| | No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 04/18/2017 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | IIC-CIAPR | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IBC-S | CRUZADO, FIGUEROA, HERRERA | CIAPR | S | 1609.1.1 |
Wind loads on every building or structure shall be
determined in accordance with Chapters 26 to 30 31 of ASCE 7.
|
Chapter 31 Wind Tunnel Procedure in ASCE 7 was missing from the code text, and is referenced in Chapters 27 and 29 of ASCE 7.
| | No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 04/18/2017 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | IIC-CIAPR | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IBC-S | CRUZADO, FIGUEROA, HERRERA | CIAPR | S | 1610.2 |
TABLE 1605.2 - WINDBORNE DEBRIS PROTECTION FASTENING SCHEDULE FOR WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS a,b,c,d
a. This table is
based on a 140 mph basic design wind speeds and a
45-foot mean roof height.
|
The statement in the footnote is vague
| | No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 04/28/2017 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | IIC-CIAPR | EST DEL GOLF CLUBPO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IBC-S | CRUZADO, FIGUEROA, HERRERA | CIAPR | S | 1610.3 |
REVISE NOTE 6 IN
FIGURES 1609.3(1),
FIGURES 1609.3(2), FIGURES 1609.3(3), FIGURES
1609.3(4)
6. Location-specific basic wind speeds shall be permitted to be determined using
www.atcouncil.org./windspeed
when applicable to ASCE 7-16.
|
The tool on the webpage referenced in note 6 does not yet mention ASCE 7-16.
| | No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | IIC-CIAPR | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IBC-S | CRUZADO, FIGUEROA, HERRERA | CIAPR | S | 1610.3 |
1609.4 Exposure category: For each wind direction considered, an
exposure category that adequately reflects the characteristics of ground
surface irregularities characteristics shall be determined
for the site at which the building or structure is to be constructed. Account
shall be taken of variations in ground surface roughness that arise from
natural topography and vegetation as well as from constructed features.
|
To eliminate unnecessary and confusing wordiness, particularly where a water surface applies.
| | No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 04/18/2017 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | IIC-CIAPR | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IBC-S | CRUZADO, FIGUEROA, HERRERA | CIAPR | S | 1610.3 |
A ground surface roughness within each 45-degree (0.79 rad)
sector shall be determined for a distance upwind of the site as defined in
Section 1609.4.3 from the categories defined below, for the purpose of
assigning an exposure category as defined in Section 1609.4.3.
|
To eliminate unnecessary and confusing wordiness, particularly where a water surface applies.
| | No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 04/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | IIC-CIAPR | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IBC-S | CRUZADO, FIGUEROA, HERRERA | CIAPR | S | 1609.4 |
1609.4.3 Exposure categories.
An exposure category shall be determined in accordance with the following:
Exposure B. For buildings with a mean roof height of less than or
equal to 30 feet (9144 mm), Exposure B shall apply where the ground surface
roughness, as defined by Surface Roughness B, prevails in the upwind
direction for a distance of at least 1,500 feet (457 m). For buildings with a
mean roof height greater than 30 feet (9144 mm), Exposure B shall apply where
Surface Roughness B prevails in the upwind direction for a distance of at least
2,600 feet (792 m) or 20 times the height of the building, whichever is
greater.
Exposure D. Exposure D shall apply where the ground surface
roughness, as defined by Surface Roughness D, prevails in the upwind
direction for a distance of at least 5,000 feet (1524 m) or 20 times the height
of the building, whichever is greater. Exposure D shall also apply where the ground
surface roughness immediately upwind of the site is B or C, and the site is
within a distance of 600 feet (183 m) or 20 times the building height,
whichever is greater, from an Exposure D condition as defined in the previous
sentence.
|
To eliminate unnecessary and confusing wordiness, particularly where a water surface applies.
| | No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | IIC-CIAPR | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IBC-S | CRUZADO, FIGUEROA, HERRERA | CIAPR | S | 1609.4 |
TABLE 1605.2 - WINDBORNE DEBRIS PROTECTION FASTENING SCHEDULE FOR WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS a,b,c,d
a. This table is based on a 140
mph basic design wind speeds and a 45-foot mean roof height.
On Risk Category I:
Buildings and other structures that represent a low hazard to
human life in the event of failure, including but not limited to:
· Agricultural
facilities.
· Certain Temporary
facilities that will be used for 6 weeks or less, such as open-air
concert and public event stages, tents, shade structures, lighting and speaker
towers, and low grandstands and bleachers.
· Minor storage
facilities.
· Screened
enclosures.
On Risk Category III:
.
.
· Power-generating
stations, water treatment facilities for potable water, waste water treatment
facilities and other public utility facilities not included in Risk Category IV.
· Other
public utility facilities not included in Risk Category IV.
On Risk Category IV:
.
.
· Ambulatory care
facilities having emergency surgery or emergency treatment facilities, dialysis
centers, and oncology treatment centers.
· First
response medical facilities
· Fire, rescue,
ambulance and police stations and emergency vehicle garages
.
.
· Buildings and
other structures having critical national defense functions.
· Water treatment
facilities for potable water and waste water treatment facilities.
· Water storage
facilities and pump structures required to maintain water pressure for fire
suppression.
· Power
generating plants (i.e., thermoelectric plants, fossil fuel renewable energy
plants, solar and wind farms, etc.) and/or stations, and all related
infrastructure systems including, but not limited, to substations, transmission
and distribution systems, including their supports.
· Fuel/gas
storage and dispatch facilities and service stations.
Self-standing communication towers for tv, radio and mobile phone
equipment.
|
During the aftermath of Hurricane Maria, it was observed throughout the island that electrical service related to Power Station, Substations, Transmission and Distribution lines was severely damaged affecting not only the delivery of power utility service but a series of other services and utilities including, but not limited to medical facilities, police stations, potable water and waste water stations and fuel/gas distribution stations.
|
Minimum. No changes in design cost. Between 5 to 10% increase in construction cost.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 04/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | IIC-CIAPR | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IPSDC-PSD | BORRAGEROS, DE LA CRUZ | CIAPR | PSD | 301.1 |
The provisions of this charter shall govern the general
regulations of private sewage disposal systems, including specific
limitations and flood hazard areas. This Code shall apply to the
disposal of domestic wastes (sewage) only.
|
The disposal of any industrial processes wastes or any detrimental or dangerous wastes is not covered by this Code and shall comply with the applicable state and/or federal regulations.
|
NONE: The code change proposal does not represent additional costs to construction or operation.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | IIC-CIAPR | PO Box 363845 | PONCE | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IPSDC-PSD | BORRAGEROS, DE LA CRUZ | CIAPR | PSD | 401.1 |
The provisions of this chapter shall
govern the evaluation of and requirements for private sewage disposal system
sites. Site evaluation and requirements shall comply with the design
standards and specifications of the Environmental Quality Board’s Underground
Injection Control Regulation.
|
In order to comply with existing requirements and regulations for Puerto Rico
|
NONE: The code change proposal does not represent additional costs to construction or operation.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IPSDC-PSD | BORRAGEROS, DE LA CRUZ | CIAPR | PSD | 1202.1 |
All private sewage disposal systems shall be inspected after
construction, but once during excavation, and before once before
backfilling.
|
In order to comply with existing requirements and regulations applicable to Puerto Rico
|
The code change proposal represent cost increment to the project due to inspection requirement by a certified professional.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IMC-M | RODRIGUEZ, LÁZARO | CIAPR | M | 101.1 |
These regulations shall be known as the International Maintenance
Code of the Government of Puerto Rico, hereinafter referred to as
“this code”.
|
Jurisdiction identification required.
| | No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IMC-M | RODRIGUEZ, LÁZARO | CIAPR | M | 102.6 |
The provisions of this code shall not be mandatory for existing
buildings or structures designated as historic buildings where such buildings
or structures are judged by the code official to be safe and in the public
interest of health, safety and welfare. The code official will make such
judgement only after consideration of a written request by the owner of the
property.
|
The code official shall assume that all buildings are required to comply with the requirements of the code. Exemptions are to be considered only upon request by the owner and should not be deemed automatic for any type of building.
|
Cost to owners, related to the time and effort required in applying for exemption. Cost to government related to the evaluation of the requests. Potential savings in the cost of restoring historic buildings that have been poorly maintained.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IMC-M | RODRIGUEZ, LÁZARO | CIAPR | M | 103 title |
SECTION 103
DEPARTMENT DIVISION OF PROPERTY
MAINTENANCE INSPECTION
|
A new division within an existing department, rather than a new department, will be more cost effective and practical to set up.
|
The new division could entail additional cost to the government. Said cost could be offset by inspection and compliance related fees, reorganization of current government divisions to give more emphasis on infrastructure preservation and the direct and indirect savings related to the reliable continuity of said infrastructure.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IMC-M | RODRIGUEZ, LÁZARO | CIAPR | M | 103.1 |
The department division of property maintenance
inspection is hereby created and the executive official in charge thereof shall
be known as the code official.
|
These new task, and the consolidation of current existing building inspection efforts (sanitation and fire prevention, for example), requires a new group to run it, but it should be part of the existing building permit organism.
|
The new division could entail additional cost to the government. Said cost could be offset by inspection and compliance related fees, reorganization of current government divisions to give more emphasis on infrastructure preservation and the direct and indirect savings related to the reliable continuity of said infrastructure.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IMC-M | RODRIGUEZ, LÁZARO | CIAPR | M | 103.2 |
The code official shall be appointed by the chief authority of
the jurisdiction Planning Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
|
The Planning Board is appointed by the chief authority of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Governor, that in turn can delegate said authority to the Planning Board.
|
Some minor cost related to the procedural effort in making the appointment.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IMC-M | RODRIGUEZ, LÁZARO | CIAPR | M | 103.5 |
The fees for activities and services performed by the department
division in carrying out its responsibilities under this code shall be
as indicated in the following schedule determined by the Planning
Board of the Government of Puerto Rico. The Planning Board shall prepare
and publish a Schedule of Fees, that shall be revised from time to time as
required to offset rising costs.
|
The fees schedule should be a separate from the code provisions to facilitate updating without having to reissue the code.
|
Time and effort, and therefore cost, will be saved.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IMC-M | RODRIGUEZ, LÁZARO | CIAPR | M | 108.1.5 |
12. Any structure, equipment or utility-related appurtenance, be
public or private, above ground or underground, on private or public property,
easement or way, that is unsafe for its intended use or to occupants or to the
general public.
|
Need to clarify and emphasize that unsafe and dangerous structures are not limited to buildings.
|
Will represent additional costs to owners that are neglecting the upkeep of their constructed infrastructure and premises. Said costs will be offset by the savings in not having to replace prematurely deteriorated infrastructure, could save lives by identifying dangerous situations and will represent savings to the government, related to crisis solving.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IMC-M | RODRIGUEZ, LÁZARO | CIAPR | M | 112.4 |
Any person who shall continue any work after having been served
with a stop work order, except such work as that person is directed to perform
to remove a violation or unsafe condition, shall be liable to a fine of not
less than [AMOUNT] dollars or more than [AMOUNT] dollars as determined
by the Planning Board of the Government of Puerto Rico. The Planning
Board shall prepare and publish a Schedule of Fines.
|
The fees schedule should be a separate from the code provisions to facilitate updating without having to reissue the code.
|
Time and effort, and therefore cost, will be saved.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IMC-M | RODRIGUEZ, LÁZARO | CIAPR | M | 302.4 |
Premises and exterior property shall be maintained free from weeds
or plant growth in excess of 24 inches. Noxious weeds shall be
prohibited. Weeds shall be defined as all grasses, annual plants and
vegetation, other than tress or shrubs provided; however, this term shall not
include cultivated flowers and gardens.
Upon failure of the owner or agent having charge of the property
to cut and destroy weeds after service notice of violation, they shall be
subject to prosecution in accordance with Section 106.3 and as prescribed but
the authority having jurisdiction. Upon failure to comply with the notice of
violation, any duly authorized employee of the jurisdiction or contractor hired
by the jurisdiction shall be authorized to enter upon the property in violation
and cut and destroy the weeds growing thereon, and the costs of such removal
shall be paid by the owner or agent responsible for he property. |
The required information has been added. Weed height in excess of 24 inches can harbor delinquents.
|
Cost to owners that otherwise neglect their properties. Savings in crime prevention, infestation mitigation and putting out brush fires.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IMC-M | RODRIGUEZ, LÁZARO | CIAPR | M | 304.14 |
During the period from to ,
every Every door, window and other outside opening required for
ventilation of habitable rooms, food preparation areas, food service areas or
any areas where products to be included or utilized in food for human
consumption are processed, manufactured, packaged or stored shall be supplied
with approved tightly fitting screens of minimum 16 mesh per inch (16 mesh per
25 mm), and every screen door used for insect control shall have as
self-closing device in good working condition.
Exception: Screens shall not be
required where other approved means, such as air curtains or insect repellent
fans, are employed. |
The possibility insect infestation is constant throughout the year in this jurisdiction.
|
Cost to owners that otherwise neglect sanitation. Savings in diseases prevention and reduction of food waste.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IMC-M | RODRIGUEZ, LÁZARO | CIAPR | M | 310 |
The procedures established herein are
the basic guidelines for the 40 Year Building Safety Inspection program.
The requirements contained in the
code, covering the maintenance of buildings, shall apply to all buildings
and/or structures now existing or hereafter erected. All buildings and/or
structures and all parts thereof shall be maintained in a safe condition, and
all devices or safeguards that are required by the code shall be maintained in
good working order. Electrical wiring, apparatus and equipment, and
installations for light, heat or power and low voltage systems as are required
and/or regulated by the code, now existing or hereinafter installed, shall be
maintained in a safe condition and all devices and safeguards maintained in
good working order.
All structures, equipment or
utility-related appurtenances, be public or private, above ground or
underground, on private or public property, easement or way, are included in
the building safety inspection program.
These guidelines shall not be
construed as permitting the removal or non-maintenance of any existing devices
or safeguards unless authorized by the code official.
310.2 Building Safety Inspection of
buildings / structures and components
For the purpose of these section,
Building Safety Inspection shall be construed to mean the requirement for
specific inspection of existing buildings and structures and furnishing the
code official with a written report of such inspection as prescribed herein.
310.2.1 Inspection procedures
1. Inspection procedures shall
conform, in general, to the minimum inspection procedural guidelines as issued
by the code official. This inspection is for the sole purpose of identifying
structural and electrical deficiencies of the building or structure that pose
an immediate threat to life safety or where failure of a critical component is
imminent. This inspection is not to determine if the condition of an existing
building is in compliance with the current edition of the International
Existing Building Code or the National Electrical Code.
2. Such inspection shall be for the
purpose of determining the structural and electrical condition of the building
or structure to the extent reasonably possible of any part, material or
assembly of a building or structure which affects the safety of such building
or structure and/or which supports any dead and/or design live load, and the
general condition of its electrical systems pursuant to the code.
3. The inspecting professional shall
have a right of entry into all areas he/she deems necessary to comply with the
program.
4). The code official shall ensure
that the owner(s) (or their duly authorized representative(s)) of all buildings
requiring inspection under these section file the necessary documentation to
confirm compliance with the guidelines set forth herein.
310.2.2 Buildings recertification
1. All buildings, except
single-family residences, duplexes and minor buildings or structures as defined
below, shall be recertified in the manner described below where such buildings
or structures have been in existence for forty (40) years or longer, as
determined by the code official, who shall at such time issue a Notice of
Required Inspection to the building owner.
2. Subsequent Building Safety
Inspections shall be required at ten (10) year intervals from the date of the
40th anniversary of existence of buildings or structures regardless of when the
inspection report for same is finalized or filed. Any buildings or structures
not otherwise excluded as set forth herein shall be inspected at the same time
as the initial 40 year inspection of the building and shall be re-inspected in
accordance with the schedule for the building. Buildings that the original 40
year inspection dates are specified in the transitory clause (2011 and earlier)
shall have the 10 year re-inspections scheduled starting 10 years following the
date scheduled in said transitory clause.
3. In the event a building is
determined to be structurally and electrically safe under the conditions set
forth herein, and such building or structure is less than forty (40) years of
age, a Building Safety Inspection shall not be required for a minimum of ten
(10) years from that time, or age forty (40), whichever is the longer period of
time.
310.2.2 Minor buildings or structures
Minor buildings or structures shall,
for the purpose of this subsection, be defined as buildings or structures in
any occupancy group having a gross area of 2,000 sq. ft. or less. Any building
or structure which houses, covers, stores or maintains any support features,
materials or equipment necessary for the operation of all or part of the
primary structure, or operation of any feature located upon the real property,
shall not be considered a minor building and shall be subject to inspection as
otherwise set forth herein. Also included in the building safety inspection
program are elevated decks and all structures, equipment or utility-related
appurtenances, be public or private, above ground or underground, on private or
public property, easement or way.
310.2.3 Required building safety
inspection report
1. The owner of a building or
structure subject to the building safety inspection shall furnish, or cause to
be furnished, within ninety (90) days of Notice of Required Building Safety
Inspection, the Building Safety Inspection Certification Form to the code
official, prepared by a Professional Engineer or Architect registered in the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, certifying that each such building or structure is
structurally and electrically safe, or has been made structurally and
electrically safe for the specified use for continued occupancy, in conformity
with the minimum inspection procedural guidelines as issued by the code
official.
2. Such written report shall bear the
impressed seal and signature of the certifying Engineer or Architect.
3. Such Engineer or Architect shall
undertake such assignments only where qualified by training and experience in
the specific technical field involved in the inspection and report.
4. Such report shall indicate the
manner and type of inspection forming the basis for the report and description
of any matters identified as requiring remedial action.
5. In the event that repairs or
modifications are found to be necessary resulting from the building safety
inspection report, the owner shall have a total of 180 days from the date of
said report, unless otherwise specified by the code official, in which to
correct the structural and electrical deficiencies that pose an immediate
threat to life, health, safety or where failure of a critical component is
imminent. Once the corrections have been completed a Professional Engineer, or
Registered Architect shall re-inspect the areas noted on the original report
and shall provide the building owner a signed and sealed letter stating the
corrections have all been completed. The building owner shall submit said
letter to the code official. For deficiencies that cannot be corrected within
180 days, the time frame may be extended when a time frame is specified by the
Professional Engineer of Registered Architect and approved by the code
official. Such extension shall be contingent on maintaining an active building
permit as specified in code.
6. Repairs or modifications of
deficient conditions that are incidental and not life threatening shall be
completed within a time frame as specified by the inspecting Professional
Engineer or Registered Architect and approved by the code official. All repairs
or modifications shall be completed in conformance with all applicable sections
of the International Existing Building Code and the National Electrical Code.
7. The code official shall make an
aleatory selection of the 10% of all safety inspection reports in a given
month. Said selected reports shall be peer reviewed for compliance with the
requirements of this section. If are reviewed report is found to be fraudulent
or otherwise nonconforming to this section due to negligence or lack of the
minimum required proficiency, then, the writer of said report shall be
penalized as required by the code and by law.
8. In the event an owner fails to
submit the 40 year inspection report the code official shall elect the choice
of either to conduct a hearing to address such failure, or to declare the
structure unsafe and unfit for occupation and revoke its occupancy permit.
9. In the event an owner fails to
comply with repair or modification requirements as determined from the building
safety inspection report as set forth herein the structure may be deemed to be
unsafe and unfit for occupation. Such findings shall be reviewed by the code
official who may declare the structure unsafe and unfit for occupation and
revoke its occupancy permit.
310.3 Transitory clause
The following transitory inspection
implementation schedule shall be implemented to bring up to date the large
building and structures population not recertified:
1. 40 year or older buildings of
30,000 square feet or more – compliance in calendar year 2019
2. 40 year or older buildings 25,000
square feet or more –
compliance no later than calendar
year 2020
3. 40 year or older building 20,000
square feet or more –
compliance no later than calendar
year 2021
4. 40 year or older buildings 17,500
square feet or more –
compliance no later than calendar
year 2022
5. 40 year or older buildings 15,000
square feet or more –
compliance no later than calendar
year 2023
6. 40 year or older buildings 12,500
square feet or more –
compliance no later than calendar
year 2024
7. 40 year or older buildings of
10,000 square feet or more – compliance in calendar year 2025
8. 40 year or older buildings 8,000
square feet or more –
compliance no later than calendar
year 2026
9. 40 year or older building 6,000
square feet or more –
compliance no later than calendar
year 2027
10. 40 year or older buildings 5,000
square feet or more –
compliance no later than calendar
year 2028
11. 40 year or older buildings 4,000
square feet or more –
compliance no later than calendar
year 2029
12. 40 year or older buildings 2,000
square feet or more –
compliance no later than calendar
year 2030
Subsequent building inspections shall
be required at ten (10) year intervals, regardless of when the inspection
report for same is finalized or filed. Any buildings or structures not
otherwise excluded as set forth herein shall be inspected at the same time as
the initial 40 year inspection of the building and shall be re-inspected in
accordance with the schedule for the building. |
Recent catastrophic events have served as clear testimony that the conservation of the built infrastructure cannot be left to the sole discretion of said infrastructure owners or custodians. These requirements, following those implemented by Florida’s Broward and Miami-Dade Counties, will be incentive for the conservation and protection of the infrastructure, specially those related to utilities.
|
Additional cost to owners that neglect their buildings and structures. Huge savings in the repair or replacement of dilapidated buildings and structures, when these are adequately conserved. Huge savings in solution of crisis when buildings and structures fail.
| No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| PABLO VAZQUEZ-RUIZ | 4/18/2018 | COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS Y AGRIMENSORES DE PR | | PO Box 363845 | SAN JUAN | +17874245832 | PR | 00936-3845 | | | presidente@ciapr.org | IMC-M | RODRIGUEZ, LÁZARO | CIAPR | M | 602 |
Section deleted completely
|
Heating not applicable in this jurisdiction.
| | No | No | No | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | PABLO VAZQUEZ RUIZ | CIAPR | CIAPR | 787-424-5832 | presidente@ciapr.org | 4/18/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| test | 4/19/2018 | test | | | | | | | | | vghfghf@jp.com | | | | | | | | | No | No | No | | | | | | | | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| E.Scott Tezak, PE | 4/20/2018 | Atkins | | 10 High Street | Boston | 867-400-2709 | MA | 02110 | | | scott.tezak@atkinsglobal.com | IBC-G | E. Scott Tezak, PE | Self | G | Chapter 4 / Section 423.3 |
423.3 Critical emergency
operations. In areas where the shelter design wind speed for tornadoes hurricanes
in accordance with Figure 304.2(1 2) of ICC 500 is 250 190
mph or greater on island states or territories where vehicle access to
the continental US by roadway or bridge is not available, 911 call
stations, emergency operations center and fire, rescue, ambulance and police
stations shall comply with Table 1604.5 as a Risk Category IV structure and
shell be provided with a storm shelter constructed in accordance with ICC 500.
| |
This proposal will increase the
cost of construction. Some of the most recent information on costs in available
in FEMA P-361, Safe Rooms for Tornadoes and Hurricanes. Guidance for Community
and Residential Safe Rooms (Third Edition, March 2015). Cost values described
herein come from this publication and previous editions of the publication.
FEMA’s safe room guidelines meet or exceed the design and construction
requirements of the ICC 500. Therefore, storm shelters should be able to be
constructed to the same cost criteria but there is no specific data available
at this time to quantify or confirm this statement. The FEMA publication (2008
Edition) stated “For large new building projects, however, the percent increase
in the overall project cost is quite small. For example, many safe rooms
protecting 200 to 300 occupants being constructed as part of a new school have
added only 1 to 2 percent to the total project cost when the safe room was
included in the design process at the beginning of the project.”
Further, based on 36 safe room
applications submitted to FEMA in 2008 the cost per square foot of the safe
rooms (in the continental U.S.) was less than $190 per square foot. Per Chapter
A3 of FEMA P-361, the average cost to harden new buildings to provide for a safe
room in a hurricane-prone region is between 5% and 8%. It is important to note
that the basic materials required for the construction of storm shelters are
the same as those for typical construction (reinforced concrete, reinforced
masonry, etc.). Special materials or assemblies are only required for door
assemblies and opening protection systems. Costs for storm shelters are
anticipated to decrease as their use becomes more widespread as these
construction materials are commonly used in the Commonwealth. The adoption of
requirements for storm shelters in hurricane prone areas for Group E
Occupancies and first responder facilities in the 2015 IBC will lead to
installation of many more storm shelters than are currently being built.
Subsequently, shelters will become less of a specialty item from a design and
construction standpoint. As the market expands for specialty products needed in
shelters, like hurricane resistant doors, windows and shutters, economies of
scale and new manufacturers joining the industry will also lead to cost
reductions.
| No | No | Yes | E. Scott Tezak, PE | E. Scott Tezak, PE | Atkins | Self | 857-400-2709 | scott.tezak@atkinsglobal.com | 4/20/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |
| E. Scott Tezak, PE | 4/20/2018 | Atkins | | 10 High Street, Suite 705 | Boston | 867-400-2709 | MA | 02110 | | | scott.tezak@atkinsglobal.com | IBC-G | E. Scott Tezak, PE | Self | G | Chapter 4, Section 423.4 |
423.4 Group E Occupancies. In areas where the
shelter design wind speed for tornadoes hurricanes is 250 190
mph or greater on island states or territories where vehicle access to
the continental US by roadway or bridge is not available in accordance with
Figure 304.2(1 2) of ICC 500, all Group E occupancies with an
occupant load of 50 or more shall have a storm shelter constructed in
accordance with ICC 500.
| |
This proposal will increase the
cost of construction. Some of the most recent information on costs in available
in FEMA P-361, Safe Rooms for Tornadoes and Hurricanes. Guidance for Community
and Residential Safe Rooms (Third Edition, March 2015). Cost values described
herein come from this publication and previous editions of the publication.
FEMA’s safe room guidelines meet or exceed the design and construction
requirements of the ICC 500. Therefore, storm shelters should be able to be
constructed to the same cost criteria but there is no specific data available
at this time to quantify or confirm this statement. The FEMA publication (2008
Edition) stated “For large new building projects, however, the percent increase
in the overall project cost is quite small. For example, many safe rooms
protecting 200 to 300 occupants being constructed as part of a new school have
added only 1 to 2 percent to the total project cost when the safe room was
included in the design process at the beginning of the project.”
Further, based on 36 safe room
applications submitted to FEMA in 2008 the cost per square foot of the safe
rooms (in the continental U.S.) was less than $190 per square foot. Per Chapter
A3 of FEMA P-361, the average cost to harden new buildings to provide for a safe
room in a hurricane-prone region is between 5% and 8%. It is important to note
that the basic materials required for the construction of storm shelters are
the same as those for typical construction (reinforced concrete, reinforced
masonry, etc.). Special materials or assemblies are only required for door
assemblies and opening protection systems. Costs for storm shelters are
anticipated to decrease as their use becomes more widespread as these
construction materials are commonly used in the Commonwealth. The adoption of
requirements for storm shelters in hurricane prone areas for Group E
Occupancies and first responder facilities in the 2015 IBC will lead to
installation of many more storm shelters than are currently being built.
Subsequently, shelters will become less of a specialty item from a design and
construction standpoint. As the market expands for specialty products needed in
shelters, like hurricane resistant doors, windows and shutters, economies of
scale and new manufacturers joining the industry will also lead to cost
reductions. | No | No | Yes | E. Scott Tezak, PE | E. Scott Tezak, PE | Atkins | Self | 857-400-2709 | scott.tezak@atkinsglobal.com | 4/20/2018 | | Failed on Start (retrying) |